Archive for December, 2009

R&R Claims Creative Media Award

R&R Partners Rachelle Houle accepts the 2009 Creative Media Award from Shawn Rorick of LVIMA

R&R Partners' Rachelle Houle-Maisner accepts the 2009 Creative Media Award from Shawn Rorick of LVIMA

The Las Vegas Interactive Marketing Association named R&R Partners’ “Chinchilli Day” interactive ad unit the best interactive ad unit for the year 2009 at the annual LVIMA Creative Media Awards show which was held on December 17, 2009. The work produced on behalf of our Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA) client was part of an integrated effort to launch the “Excuses” campaign and drive viewers on YouTube to the Las Vegas brand channel. The integrated R&R and LVCVA team is way too big to list here. But, to all those who helped bring the Chinchillis to the Internet we say congratulations. Excellent work team!

This was the fourth year LVIMA has held the Creative Media Awards and I am proud to say the interactive work in Las Vegas has improved every year. 2009 was by far the most competitive awards show. My favorite winning entry was the MGM Grand “Sins” viral campaign. The work is just so brand appropriate and takes full advantage of social media to engage visitors and generate tons of really cool content. R&R would like to express our gratitude to Shawn Rorick and LVIMA for an excellent year of events. We look forward to another year of fun and kick ass interactive work in 2010. Click the links below to view a sampling of the digital work R&R Vegas is most proud of from 2009:

To view a recap of the LVIMA Creative Media Awards and check out all the winning entries click here.

We’re Pretty Funny

Each year around, the holiday special TBS Funniest Commercials spotlights the world’s most humorous work and counts down the Top Ten Funniest Spots as voted on by the viewing public. For several years one of our spots is always featured among the many, which is compliment enough. However this year, the “What’s Your Excuse?” spot “ChinChilli Day,” made it into the voting round and took home the #2 slot among Funniest of the Year! As if this wasn’t enough, the producers also featured the “WHHSH” spot “Pearly Gates.” What a great way to close out 2009!

Social Marketing News 12/14/09

After months of rumors and speculation, it’s official: the Google phone is real. It’s called the Nexus One, and several Googlers (Google employees) have been issued beta devices and are using them now. Google has been working on a partnership with T-mobile to offer the phone at a discount, after Verizon turned down the deal. However, the Nexus One will not be exclusively sold through T-mobile, it will be an unlocked device (unlike how the iPhone is tethered to AT&T). News about the Nexus One is all over the web, but a good place to start is with this Mashable article.

More changes to how Facebook handles privacy settings.  With an update last week, users can now set privacy settings for each wall posting separately, and now Facebook profile information can be indexed by search engines (which has implications for real-time search). Be sure to read up on the changes from cnet News and PC World.

Holiday shopping is in full swing, and analysts have reported an up tick in online shopping this season. New research comScore has shown just how much social media is effecting holiday shopping.  Check out this TechCrunch article for details, stats and charts.

A great article from ChannelWeb discusses Google and Apple’s dance with acquisitions. Earlier, Social Media News reported Google’s acquisition of AdMob. Recently, Apple just purchased online music streaming service LaLa, which may revolutionize the way Apple sells music.

(more…)

Friday inspiration … on Monday

Friday Inspiration on Monday

Some of the interesting things we talk about at Friday’s Creative Meeting that you get to see on Monday.

Adweek goes over the Best of the Decade in marketing.

Orangina whips out a new flavor.

Ping Pong the way it’s played in the dog-eat-dog world.

Target gets awkward.
 

The new Grammy site highlights fans.

Peter Burr assaults the eyes.

http://weloveyouso.com/2009/12/peter-burr/

The Happy Router

The web’s most controversial web sites.

Bay blows up Victoria’s Secret.

The mall gets dark and creepy.

The Reading. One of Adweek’s Best Spots for October

That’s it for this week. See you next Friday/Monday.

Book Publishers: Read The Writing on The Wall

I used to think the book industry, unlike the music and newspaper industries, really understood the digital evolution/revolution. E-readers hit the market and they were publishing and selling e-books, on top of the digital audio book downloads available on iTunes and other digital distribution sites. They had it all figured out. The book industry had developed three channels of distribution and three revenue sources. Even better, they were getting more books to more people. Better still, they were letting consumers of books get the content the way they wanted to consume it. Awesome!

Then I read this headline from the Associated Press: “Publishers say they’re holding back some e-books.” My head exploded. It seems some book publishers like HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster, and Hachette Book Group USA intend to hold some titles back from digital release by as much as four months. Simon & Schuster CEO Carolyn Reidy was quoted in the Associated Press article as saying “The rise in e-books has led to cannibalizing of new hardcover books sales.” Really! Duh! Why is that a bad thing?

Amazon sells an e-book for $9.99, much lower than what a hardcover book costs. Obviously, the publishers make greater profits from hardbound book distribution. But as I think about the types of book readers that I know, I’m not sure publishers are thinking this all the way through.

I know at least three types of book readers. One is my sister-in-law, who reads books like they are going out of style. She can read a book in a day, and she can’t wait to start a new title. My sister-in-law was the one who showed me her Kindle at least a year ago. She loves e-books because she can consume books as fast as she can download and read them. She loves to say, “I just finished a great book by so-and-so; you should read it” or “Did you ever read such-and-such?”

The other reader I know is my mother. She reads almost daily and follows a stable of favorite authors. She is not a fast reader, but rather a casual reader who loves the weight of the book in her hands as much as she loves the smell of the ink on the pages. If the book is by one of her favorite authors she will run out and buy the hardcover. She even collects vintage first-run books and loves to show off her finds.

And then there’s me. I hate reading. The last ten books I read were books on tape … so I guess I didn’t really read them. I like it when someone like James Earl Jones reads me a story while I am flying cross- country or driving in the car. As my high school and college teachers learned, if you hand me a book to read, I’ll look for the CliffsNotes or the movie. For me, nothing is better than an iTunes gift card and a good book on tape. Ahem… I mean iPod.

Now, as I think about these types of readers and put on my marketing hat, I see one huge glaring mistake with the publishers’ e-book withholding strategy. My sister-in-law is a book influencer; she reads more books than anyone else I know and uses her knowledge to influence others to buy books based on her suggestions. The book companies are wrong to withhold books from her, for two reasons. First, she buys more books than anyone I know. Volume sales! Book readers like my sister-in-law are buying reading material at much higher levels than others. She also adopted the Kindle faster than anyone and that’s the audience for e-readers and e-books. Secondly, she can sell a good book better than anyone named Simon or Schuster. Instead of withholding books, they should leak the books to their best digital customers and ask them to review it on their social media sites. That would provide instant peer-to-peer marketing through social media. Too smart!

Maybe I am wrong to think that the book industry is trying to save the dinosaurs from dying. A coworker of mine has a theory … he thinks the publishers are looking for leverage against the online retailers and that this isn’t just some shortsighted digital slight. He thinks the publishing industry is trying to learn from the music industry by establishing better financial terms with online retailers like Amazon. The music industry had no digital foresight and was forced to fight a pitched battle first with free peer-to-peer sharing sights like Napster and later with retailers such as Apple to gain control — and a share of — digital music distribution. By withholding digital titles from e-retailers like Amazon, they have leverage to negotiate a bigger slice of the digital distribution pie. He might just be right.

Either way the book industry stands to alienate their best customers and lose out on a huge opportunity to harness the peer-to-peer influencing power of the super readers. And, yes … I did get through college without reading the Iliad and the Odyssey. I have seen the movie so I know what I missed.

Making rain in the desert

The Phoenix office of R&R Partners took an unusual approach to holiday merry-making this year. Instead of patting ourselves on the back and popping champagne, we took a cue from the broad sentiment that it has been a challenging year for businesses of all types.

We felt the best kind of holiday party is one with purpose – and one that could connect others for a better 2010.

On Dec. 3, the “rCelebration” bash brought 11 industries and 80+ organizations together for a night of networking as well as a very loud “thank you” for sustaining our own business through 2009. CIMG2280R&R hosted about 125 clients, vendors and business friends – with a theme designed around giving thanks and giving back. Together, we recognized that through mutual support, all of us survived an historic year.

R&R recruited local vendors to encourage support of neighboring businesses. They included Su Vino – a Scottsdale-based winery, Cruz Tequila – an award-winning tequila maker started by former ASU fraternity brothers, and Rock Bottom – a local brewery. Honey Moon Sweets provided an amazing cake designed to mimic our event invitation. And the fantastic cook-to-order Italian buffet came from nearby Scottsdale’s FireSky Resort.

Guests contributed canned goods at the door and, together, we made an 800-pound contribution to St. Mary’s Food Bank. 800 lbs of food! And over conversation (and a few tequila shots) new prospects were made for a robust 2010. Although we still couldn’t help the State Treasurer resolve that nagging $3 billion-dollar deficit.

Special thanks to the R&R Live division, which added incredible flair and polish to an event that, as intended, summoned the rain clouds of commerce in to a parched corner of the Sonoran Desert. We look on to a New Year and wish everyone bright success in 2010.

 

CIMG2247

CIMG2250

What are we thankful for in 2009? From great colleagues to great clients to Sprinkles cupcakes around the corner... it's all on the wall.

What are we thankful for in 2009? From great colleagues to great clients to Sprinkles cupcakes around the corner... it's all on the wall.

One-way social media? Expect to see more BS from BCS

Usually it’s tough to like anything that, at the same time, makes you nuts. Outside of a few personal romantic endeavors, the two emotions seldom have gone hand-in-hand. But this year, much like every year, I sat around waiting to hear the bowl selections handed down to us from the all-knowing BCS and their brigade of money-hungry bowl sponsors. And this year, much like every year, I prayed to heavens above that the system would fail miserably so the adoring college football fans would get their much deserved playoff system setup and the BCS would forever be shunned.

But…it didn’t happen; at least, not in every circumstance. The BCS gave us some mouthwatering matches and like always, they shafted some much deserving teams. What is one of those enticing games? The MAACO Bowl.

Being born and raised in Las Vegas, the Vegas Bowl, or MAACO Bowl as it’s presently called, has been an event attended by my family for many years. In recent years, this event has become better and better. Teams in both conferences that the bowl plucks from, the Mountain West and the Pac 10, have continued to become increasingly better. This year is one of the best matchups in recent memory and possibly the best ever with Oregon State and BYU going head to head. The two teams have a combined record of 18-6, finished third and second in their respective conferences and both finished the season ranked in the top 20.

I was happy. Las Vegas was happy. But was the public happy? No. No they weren’t.

We know this because the forward-thinking people at the BCS set up their own social media funnel and began to educate marketers on how not to use it. As everyone knows…wait, excuse me, as everyone should know, social media is as much conversational as it is social. Very hard to be social and not have a conversation.

The BCS began to post and tweet pro-BCS messages to its Facebook and Twitter followers and did nothing to respond to the superfluous wave of hate, mostly about the lack of a playoff system, being posted from fans across the country. One fan posted that the BCS is the most hated institution in America; more than the IRS and even more than the KKK. Now, I have not been working in the advertising field for a long time, but it seems when you’re hated more than the KKK, you might want to reconsider the very essence of your brand.

Problem is, the BCS wants nothing to do with reconsidering its position on the no-playoff platform. According to Jeff Ma, co-founder and VP research for Citizen Sports and the author of the sports apps, Sportacular, “If your product is hated because of a lack of understanding, social media gives you a good opportunity to communicate with consumers in an interactive and engaging manner. In the BCS example, I think their problem is that they are not fostering conversation.”

But why aren’t they? We have heard social media success stories from mega-brands like Coca-Cola, Starbucks and Virgin America. They have proven that conversation and listening to your consumers pays off, but does the BCS even care about conversing with fans? Could this conversation lead to a rethinking of the college football bowl system? Or is it simply about the green?

The BCS system has been adopted under contract until 2014 and has signed a four-year $500 million deal with ESPN’s parent company, Walt Disney, to televise the games. They appear wanting to take an interest in their fan base and social community, as they have hired Ari Fleischer Communications to control their PR. Funny thing about Ari Fleischer, he was the press secretary under the Bush administration. As Stewart Mandel, Sports Illustrated college football writer puts it, “The BCS, the most unpopular entity in sports, hired a guy who worked under the most unpopular president in history.”

It seems as if the BCS is indeed all about the green. And if they aren’t, they need to come out and acknowledge their fans, acknowledge that why they will not set up a playoff system, and acknowledge why big-time sponsors get a say in the highest ranked bowl games. What they cannot do is continue what they’re doing. They need to talk with the people that make their product profitable instead of sitting back, appeasing the few fans they actually made happy.

So when I sit in the frigid cold of another high-desert evening watching two top-rated teams battle it out for a hefty chunk of change and possibly pride, I can only imagine what could have been for the thousands of fans and handful of schools wondering where their shot of glory is, and why their voice has been silenced.

Social Marketing News 12/7/09

Editor’s note: Social Marketing News will now be posted each week on Mondays. Be sure to check our R&R’s Friday Inspiration posts every Friday.

Social Marketing News from 11/14/09 covered Rupert Murdoch’s statement about preventing Google from indexing News Corporation publications. This week, Google announced an update to its “First Click Free” program, partly in response to Murdoch’s threats I’m sure. First Click Free allows web users to access paid content, like news from newspaper websites, for free if they found that content through Google search. Now Google is giving more control to publishers, allowing them to lock out unregistered users after a defined number of page views. Google allows paid content providers to limit up to five free page views, per day- after that, users would be redirected to a registration page. Google search plays a huge role in helping users discover paid content, providing a significant amount of site traffic to many of these large publishers. So it makes sense for publishers to allow their content to be indexed by Google. However, publishers of premium content are also interested in making a profit. It will be interesting to watch what happens now, if News Corp. really does decide to completely block Google indexing, and if they decide to make an exclusive deal with Bing. If you’re still confused about First Click Free, check out this great 5-Click FAQ from Wired.

Google also announced a deal with Twitter this week to integrate the microblogging site with its own social media service, Google Friend Connect. That’s really interesting, because Google and Twitter are both in the race for real time search, so in a way Google and Twitter are competitors. It’s also interesting in light that Yahoo! and Bing have recently made deals with Facebook, and Google has yet to follow suit. Check out the Bing announcement here, and the Yahoo announcement here.

Speaking of Facebook, there’s a lot of talk about Mark Zuckerberg’s announcement of privacy changes. If you’re worried, don’t be. The announcement, which was posted in a Facebook note to users, doesn’t reveal sweeping new privacy changes. It does say that Facebook is doing away with regional networks, which is a good thing. This only relates to privacy in that you won’t be able to share your photos and posts to all of your selected regional network, which would be the town you live in or the college you attended. If you’re anything like me, you didn’t do that anyway. Users have always had the option to select who sees what, and I generally limit my content to Friends, or Friends of Friends (if you need help understanding how to manage your Facebook privacy settings, leave a comment).

A more significant bit of Facebook news came from Mashable in a reveal of screenshots for the next redesign. This interface update is more extensive than the simpler News Feed/Live Feed update. I’m looking forward to the launch, these new layout changes should improve Facebook’s engagement and usability.

The best tablet computer interface that I’ve seen to date is this demo from Sports Illustrated. SI appears to be moving in the right direction transitioning from print to digital media.

If you’re considering a new mobile site, or looking to improve, check out this article from WSJ: Squeezing Web Sites Onto Cellphones.

Wrapping up, I wanted to point out two important articles from Brandweek. Be sure to read Why Social Sites Are Less Friendly to Video Ads, and A Marketer’s New Worry: Are My Ads Retweetable?

(more…)

Friday Inspiration

Here are some of the wonderful and weird we talked about at today’s creative meeting.

This is really an incredible blog. A visual feast of the cool.

Love the scummy bubbles. It’s sad when stuff like this happens.

Ever since Chinchilli there have been lots of hamsters and rodents. Some with familiar actors:

 

Great video banner system for showcasing videos.

Great stuff you should buy people for Christmas or just send to me if you are looking for a job.

A new magazine about sustainability with a cool video to introduce it

Use this test before driving. I wish all bar bathrooms had it.

Interesting banners from Apple:

A fake product becomes real.

What Creative Directors are like:

The Tao of Don Draper.

And last, where I belong.

That’s it for this week. Thanks for looking.

Does the Tiger Brand Still Have Teeth?

Full disclosure. I’ve been a fan of Tiger Woods as long as anyone. I watched him as a 3-year-old hitting golf balls on the old Mike Douglas talk show. Sat rapt in front of the TV for each of his three consecutive U.S. Amateur victories. I was in the gallery on that October day in Las Vegas in 1996 when he won his first PGA Tour event. I’ve pulled for him to win every tournament he’s entered and every match he’s played. The level of his talent, the power of his concentration, the strength of his will – are awe-inspiring.

None of that has changed. I still believe Tiger is the best ever to pick up a club (even though Jack Nicklaus is, and always has been, my hero). I still believe he will eventually hold every record of significance in the game of golf. I will still root for Tiger Woods the golfer.

But what about Tiger Woods the man? What about Tiger Woods the Brand? Tougher questions.
As far as Tiger the man goes, I don’t know him, have never met him and doubt that I ever will. I will confess to a certain disappointment in learning that the focus, discipline and will that make him so good inside the gallery ropes didn’t seem to manifest themselves quite as sharply in his life off the course. But in the end, I guess it’s a confirmation of what most us knew instinctively anyway. That’s he’s human, with human weaknesses, capable of making human mistakes. Just like all of us. And that’s all I’m going to say, because that’s all I know. I hope he and his family can find some sort of peace and reconciliation. But in truth, that is none of my business.

Tiger the Brand? Well, that’s another story. Because I do have a relationship with Tiger the Brand. In fact, the late Phil Dusenberry of BBDO was quoted as saying that brand is “the relationship between a product and its customers.” So I, and millions of others around the world, do have something to say about Tiger the Brand. He’s our guy. Our Nike guy, our Gatorade guy, our Gillette razor guy, our Accenture guy. We revere him and trust him and believe him. Or at least we did. Now I’m not so sure.

For me, the problem was the first five days. The Escalade hits the hydrant at 2:30 Friday morning and then all day Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday and Tuesday – nothing. At least nothing from Tiger, beyond the first strange reports. But nature abhors a vacuum, and so do the news, sports and gossip media. So they did all the talking for him, and none of it was good. Finally, on Wednesday, the admission of “transgressions” on a Web site posting that expressed as much dismay about his treatment from the media as it did personal remorse for hurting his family. Better, but still not great.

So where to from here? It’s early yet, but I would be very surprised if his big sponsors – Nike, Gatorade and Accenture – run away from him. They simply have too much invested in Tiger the Brand. Will they lose customers? Maybe a small number, but I can’t envision a mass exodus from Nike Golf or Gatorade over this. The products are good, their customers loyal. And as we’re told over and over again, America is the land of second chances. Just ask Michael Vick, Kobe Bryant or Alex Rodriguez.

Soon, we’ll be hearing from marketing types pointing out, once again, how tricky it is for large companies to tie their promotional fortunes to one person and what the consequences are when that one person messes up. I don’t know. Michael Jordan wasn’t a saint and Air Jordan remains a solid brand for Nike. Kobe Bryant’s jersey is the top seller worldwide. People forget, people move on and commerce continues. With a 24-hour news cycle and plenty of other athletes and celebrities out there doing silly things, the Tiger furor will undoubtedly ebb and eventually die out. Especially if he wins a couple of majors in 2010.

But has there been some credibility lost? For me there has. And unfortunately, each day seems to bring a new revelation, or a new name, into the story. And the golfer who has been telling me for the last 13 years to play with Nikes, drive Buicks, shave with Gillette razors and drink Gatorade won’t come out and tell us what happened.

No doubt, it’s certainly his right to stay away from the cameras. This is, as they say, a free country. I’m sure he’s getting advice from lawyers, agents, crisis control experts and all the others who are called when things go wrong. I’m no expert in those matters, but as a fan and as a consumer, I hope they advise him to show all of us that he is capable of the same focus – and the same courage – that he exhibits each day on the golf course.